NHL Realignment Project – Week 43

NHL Realignment Project - Week 43

Five Alive

Okay, so we spent last week talking about a very unlikely scenario—contraction, this week we’re going to go with a slightly more probably occurrence—one where no teams move, no teams are added and no teams are lost. In short, we’re talking about realignment in its truest form—just realigning the existing teams into a different divisional breakdown.

I’ve taken the 30 teams in the NHL and kept them divided into 2 Conferences. What’s different is that I’ve broken each Conference into 5 Divisions instead of 3. The tight geography of this breakdown is it’s strength. If some of this seems eerily familiar, I’ve borrowed liberally from Week 33… you’re not going crazy.


The Map:

NOTE: As an added bonus for the last 10 weeks of the NHL Realignment Project (can you believe it?!), I’ve updated the map to be much bigger and nicer than the the first 42 weeks. It’s based on my free wallpaper of the current NHL and measures 1280 x 800 pixels. Enjoy.

NHL Realignment Map - Week 43

NHL Realignment Map - Week 43


The Breakdown:

Again, we have 2 Conferences, and they are tagged with Good Ol’ Gary™’s favorite names—Eastern and Western.

The 5 Divisions in each Conference are a mix of directional names, geographic features and historical nicknames… but honestly the names could be whatever folks want them to be (feel free to toss some ideas into the comments section). We’ve got a great mix of geographically sensible rivalries as well as a traditional ones (and wouldn’t you know it, tons of them are both).


Gained teams:

None (sorry, Quebec City, Kansas City, Salt Lake City, Oklahoma City, Seattle City, Las Vegas City, Hamilton City, Hartford City, Houston City and Portland City)


Lost teams:

None (people of Phoenix, Columbus and Long Island, REJOICE!)


The Benefits:

• Scheduling/Travel — Listen up, NHL and PA (and you too, Red Wings, Jets, Wild and Stars)! Here is the solution the biggest issue of the day (besides the egos of many of the combatants in the forthcoming CBA battle):

3-team divisions mean that the season is made up of 3 things:

  • Divisional Play:
    • Home-and-home series against divisional opponents
  • Play outside of your Division:
    • 3-game road trips (each trip is against all three teams in a single division)
    • 3-game home-stands (same thing as above except at home)
– It’s simple enough for fans, players and owners to grasp.
– Road trips are reasonably short, and as an added bonus, the travel from game-to-game during each a road trip isn’t too bad since divisions are “reasonably small” in geographic scope.
– Everyone loves home-and-home series which mean to 120+ minutes of game-time agains “those same bastards” in a very few days (PIMs galore!). Toss in the fact that “those bastards” are who you are in essence, fighting against for a spot in the playoffs, and you play each of your two division-mates eight times(!) per season, those games will be more intense then we can imagine.
– Oh, and every team plays every other team both home and away (Something the NHL and the fans wanted). See the Schedule Breakdown section a little further down the page for even more on the sublime simplicity (and “you can’t argue against this-ness”) of the plan.

• Fairness — Unlike the  NHLPA, I don’t subscribe to the “the teams in the 7-team conferences have are more likely to make the playoffs” argument (listen, you are more likely to qualify for the post-season in an awful 8-team conference than a really competitive 7-team conference), but this point is moot now anyways. This new plan calls for all teams play in equal-sized divisions with the same coin-flip percentage of making the playoffs, so everyone is happy, right? Additionally, with the “escape hatch” of there being three wild-card spots available to the non-division champs with the three best records, and there should be no whining.

• Rivalries —  The majority of the principal divisional rivalries are preserved. PIT/PHI, the 3 NYC-area teams, MTL/BOS, the 3 California teams, the 3 Western Canada teams are all keep alive and well. While PHI loses NYR as a rival, DET gains TOR and COL/DAL has some great history. Decent compensation, I say.

• John Williams — With a division named “Empire”, there definately be a lot of in-arena playing of Vader’s theme from Star Wars. Bahn-bahn-bahn, bahn-BA-duh, bahn-BA-dah!!



Each team plays all it’s non-divisional opponents once at home and once on the road: 2 games x 27 teams = 54 games (played in three-game road trips to a single division, and three-game home-stands against a single division)

Each team plays its in-division opponents four times at home and four times on the road: 8 games x 2 teams = 16 games (played in home-and-home series)

Each team plays another set of games against the three teams from two divisions in their same conference: 2 games x 6 teams = 12 games (again, played in a three-game road trip and three-game home-stand (which divisions you play rotates each year, complete in 2-year cycles)

54 games + 16 games + 12 games = 82 games

Pretty simple. It doesn’t completely keep Columbus from having to make long in-conference road trips, but the trips are shorter in duration and more logistically sensible. Plus, as far as non-Eastern Time Zone road-trips go, the Jackets would only have two more of those than they would have Eastern Time Zone road-trips. The Ducks, Kings and Sharks no longer have to deal with a divisional opponent two time zones away either. You can argue that the Stars and Coyotes would occasionally have a two-hour difference, but that’d only be for the few weeks of the season when Arizona doesn’t spring forward for Daylight Savings, but Dallas (and the rest of the civilized world) does.



Playoff qualification is now a reward for hard-earned divisional championships with three wildcards available for the “fell-just short” teams. While this is a bit different, the structure of the playoffs themselves is pretty much what we currently have (addressing yet another major concern of many players, teams, fans).

• 5 division winners from each conference qualify for the playoffs (seeded #1-#5 by record)

• 3 best records amongst the non-division winners in each conference are awarded wild-card spots (seeded #6-#8 by record)

• Round One: Conference Quarterfinals — #1 vs #8, #2 vs #7, #3 vs #6, #4 vs #5

• Round Two: Conference Semifinals — Highest seed vs lowest seed, 2nd highest vs 2nd lowest

• Round Three: Conference Finals

• Round Four: Stanley Cup Finals

• All series best-of-seven (2-2-1-1-1 format, with highest seeded team (not necessarily best record) with home-ice advantage)


The Closing Argument:

NHL regular season is just better when A) divisions mean a ton and B) conferences are less important. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you exhibit A in this argument: The NFL… and exhibit B: The NBA. It makes infinitely more sense for teams to identify with their own division and rally against division-mates in epic struggles to qualify for the playoffs, than to think of them as just another few teams to deal with in a vague quest against 14 other teams for one of 8 spots.

In short, we’d rather have teams claw, scratch and fight for 5 division crowns (with 3 consolation prizes), than meander through a season in search of one of 8 prizes (3 of which have a lil’ bonus attached).

For all you conference-lovers out there we have the greatest thing in all of sports… the NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs

Don’t forget to share our lil’ project with your hockey fan friends. And, as always, thanks for reading. Until next Sunday!

— TF

Make sure to check out the entire NHL Realignment Project ».

12 Responses to NHL Realignment Project – Week 43

  1. DaveNY says:

    Question about realignment: suppose that the NHL does go back to the 4-division format. Instead of having the first two rounds of the playoffs contested within the same division, why not re-seed the divisions into two “playoff conferences” each year? One year, you’d get divisions B and D grouped together – that would mean there could be playoff series between Detroit, Chicago, Montreal, Toronto, and Boston. The next year you’d randomly get divisions B and C together, with Detroit, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and New York fighting it out to get to the Stanley Cup Finals. Imagine the rivalries that would spring up over the years, and they wouldn’t depend on geography!!

    Why should the Blackhawks AND Flyers both have to get back to the Stanley Cup Finals in the same year to have a rematch that is more than one or two games a year? Or the Bruins and Canucks? Or the Penguins and the Red Wings? With my system, they could meet in any round of the playoffs, depending on the random seeding for that year.

    • tom says:

      I like that a lot. The extra travel that that may impose will more than be worth it.

      • DaveNY says:

        About the travel… I wonder if the NHL would ever be up to go the 2-3-2 route for the best of 7 series. Home team makes a trip there and back if the series goes to 6 games.

        I tried to get Barry Melrose to address this idea on a Sports Nation chat. No such luck. I wonder how one would go about trying to suggest this to someone (anyone) who would have some power to do something about it….

        Have you suggested your 3-team divisions to anyone? It’s a great idea. Or if they leave the current divisions alone, what about a home-and-away vs. the other 15 conference teams (30 games). Add to that 2 home and 1 away for the intra-conference but inter-division games (30 games, rotating each year). Lastly, 5-6 games in the division (20-24 games). = 80-84 games

        • tom says:

          I really like the 3-team divisions concept too. If only we could get Gary and the Boys (and the NHLPA too, I guess) to read the blog and shake up their ideas.

  2. mike w says:

    biggest waste of reading time in quite awhile. see ya.

  3. Dave says:

    The pods idea is fantastic – and an easy fix to the scheduling woes.

    I took your concept and modified it based on the increasing likelihood that the Coyotes will move to Quebec City. Here are my pods (Western Conference and Eastern Conference preserved):

    I further propose that while winning your division gives you a playoff spot, you are not guaranteed a top-5 ranking. All 8 qualifiers in each conference would be straight-up ranked 1-8. As well, the format of the series can be modified to best suit the travel needs of both teams. (i.e. if Detroit is facing LA or Vancouver, they can opt to do a 2-3-2 format).

  4. Paul says:

    I like this plan for a number of resons- 1- the importance of divisional games 2 the balanced nature of it, and 3- the fact that hte eastern teams would have to drag their asses out of the eastern time zone a heck of a lot more- much fairewr in this regard.
    One difference I’d like is the games played. I suggest 6 against each divisional opponent; 3 against each other conference opponent (two divisons per season have the home adv, the next year it reverses; and 2 against each team in the other conference.
    Oh, when longer road trips are necessary, beacause of arenas being blocked for a circus or such, they play against 2 divisions.
    They could even schedule the road trips for the more northern teams to the southern desinations in Dec-FEb., and do the other divisdion trips in the less frigid months.

  5. Paul says:

    btw, the math works out to be 12 divisional games, 36 vs. non-divisonal opponents in the same conference teams, and 30 vs the other conference- 12+36+30= 78
    Makes the regular season a week or so shorter, not a bad thing!

  6. Pingback: Handyman Livermore

  7. I am in fact happy to read this weblog posts which includes lots of valuable information,
    thanks for providing these data.

  8. Yoou made some really good points there. I checked on thee
    web for more information about the isue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.