NHL Realignment Project – Week 52

NHL Realignment Project - Week 52

Rivalry Pods

Things look bleak right about now for us fans of the NHL. The lockout has moved from meeting rooms to courtrooms. The players (and their leader) have decided that what the NHL has to offer is just not good enough (and honestly, I can’t blame them), and they are willing to fight to the end for something a little more fair. I’m not gonna get too into the woods on the issues causing the lockout, other than to say two of the problems (and they go hand-in-hand) are there are a few too many teams in places where the game,  as it is currently set up, just isn’t sustainable AND the more successful teams think too much in terms of “me, me, me” and not in terms of a healthy league top to bottom creating a rising tide that lifts all boats.

But I digress.

Whether we get a super short season in the beginning of 2013 or not, the earliest we’ll see realignment is for the 2013-14 season. For the record, I think that the league will do so, and will either but something similar to what they proposed last December back on the table (and the foreshadowing of expansion that comes with it), or they will opt for a short term fix that is just a tweaking of the current system. With that in mind, I present the last official entry of the NHL Realignment Project.

While I had flirted with the idea of going into another elaborate description of expansion and crazy scheduling pods and special rivalry games, I thought… let’s just get back to basics and get something doable and sensible done (are you listening to me, Gary and Donald?).

So while this does cause the eager fans in Seattle, Quebec City, Markham, et. al. to have to wait a bit more before landing teams (via expansion and/or relocation), this is actually something that can be done quickly, without ruffling tooooooooo many feathers and addresses some (but not all) of the beefs with the NHL’s current lineup. The league would do well to take this step, even if subsequent expansion renders it obsolete soon, if for no other reason than to say, “Hey, we’re past the dark days and moving in a positive direction.”

Other than a few slight changes to the map, the main thing this week’s scenario introduces is something I call “Rivalry Pods.”

I’ve always tried to keep as many of the league’s rivalries intact during my realignment scenarios, but you can’t get them all neatly into divisions no matter how you break ’em up. But now, with rivalry pods, you get to add a few additional games versus rivals each year. The rivalries in the NHL don’t all line up perfectly, but this allows for teams like DET and TOR to have an extra home-and-home each season, or DAL and SJS… even thought they are actually in different divisions. But, I’m getting ahead of myself—first we’ve got to look at the divisions…


The Map:

NHL Realignment Map - Week 52

NHL Realignment Map – Week 52


The Breakdown:

The main changes we see are moving Winnipeg out of the Southeast and Dallas out of the Pacific. To most outside observers, these are the most glaring anomalies in the league’s current alignment. While Minnesota and Winnipeg still have to travel two time zones over for games in the arenas of three of the division-mates, unlike what Dallas had, they at least have each other as near-ish neighbors… not to mention those two cities have no problems retaining eyeballs on TV sets for late starting hockey games. Hockey is king in Manitoba, is and arguably so in Minnesota too, so the Pacific Time Zone is less of an issue.

It’ll be interesting to have a division with four Canadian teams in it to kinda counter-balance the three that are US-only. While Detroit doesn’t get it’s long-standing wish to move to the Eastern Conference, I think it’s time we all admit the NHL just isn’t going to do that. They’ll go to the four-conference option first, rendering that argument null. Since this is short-term plan, there is no need to introduce that upheaval now.

Western Confernce
Northwest Division Pacific Division Central Division
Calgary Flames Anaheim Ducks Chicago Blackhawks
Edmonton Oilers Colorado Avalanche Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild Los Angeles Kings Detroit Red Wings
Vancouver Canucks Phoenix Coyotes Nashville Predators
Winnipeg Jets San Jose Sharks St. Louis Blues
Eastern Conference
Northeast Division Atlantic Division Southeast Division
Boston Bruins New Jersey Devils Carolina Panthers
Buffalo Sabres New York Islanders Columbus Blue Jackets
Montreal Canadiens New York Rangers Florida Panthers
Ottawa Senators Philadelphia Flyers Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs Pittsburgh Penguins Washington Capitals

Other than the league’s current crazy alignment, the other main beef I have is scheduling. This new version of the NHL would include a schedule to that has every team visit to every arena each season at least once. That’ just something that makes sense to me. This weird “some years here, some years not… some years you each get a home game, some years, just one of you hosts the other” thing has got to go. To solve this, allow me to introduce…

Rivalry Pods:

While the division breakdowns of this realignment scenario address a great majority of the rivalries in the NHL, with a little creative thinking, we can work more rivalry games into the schedule. Teams would play each of their pod-rivals in an extra home-and-home series sprinkled throughout the season. I’d suggest use of third jerseys or throwback jerseys for these games (at least for the home team). I’ll get into more specifics on the schedule in just a bit, but first let’s look at the pods themselves:
Rivalry Pod 1 CHI, DAL, MIN, SJS, VAN
Rivalry Pod 2 ANA, CGY, EDM, LAK, PHX
Rivalry Pod 3 BOS, COL, DET, MTL, TOR
Rivalry Pod 4 FLA, NSH, STL, TBL, WPG
Rivalry Pod 5 BUF, CBJ, OTT, PHI, PIT
Rivalry Pod 6 CAR, NJD, NYI, NYR, WSH

Granted, not all teams within pods are rivals of all other teams in the pod (that’s just not possible to align), but there is plenty of historical bad-blood, and/or geographical proximity amongst the teams to make most of these games extra-interesting. DET/TOR, DET/COL, CHI/VAN, DAL/SJS, DAL/MIN, oh my! Coupled with divisional rivalries, we get more of what makes the NHL great—rivalry games—without overdoing it with just playing more and more games against your division-mates. I think this’d be the perfect balance, and really good for the game.


Gained teams:


Lost teams:




Against each divisional opponent — 3 home and 3 away games:
6 games x 4 teams = 24 games

Against each non-divisional conference opponent — 1 home and 1 away game:
2 games x 10 teams = 20 games 

Against each non-conference opponent — 1 home and 1 away game:
2 games x 15 teams = 30 games

Against each pod-rival — an additional home-and-home series:
2 games x 4 teams = 8 games

24+20+30+8 = an 82 game season



Playoffs remain unchanged from current format of 8 qualifying teams from each conference playing in a four-round (all best-of-seven) knock-out tournament.  Three division champs from each conference are seeded 1-3 and the next five best records round out the 8 conference qualifiers.

Round 1 — Conference Quarter-finals:
1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, 4 vs 5

Round 2 — Conference Semi-finals (teams reseeded after first round):
1 vs 4, 2 vs 3

Round 3 — Conference Finals:
Two surviving teams vie for Conference Championship

Round 4 — Stanley Cup Finals:
Eastern Conference Champion vs Western Conference Champion


A Big Thank You:

Okay guys. That’s it! Over a year ago, I challenged myself to show the endless possibilities of realignment  (and the fact that none of them will make everyone happy). While my “52 scenarios in 52 weeks” plan fell through because of life and work, I did finally see it through to the end. Thank you so much for reading and commenting over the last (quite a) few months. Your input has shaped quite a few of the proposals I put forward (killing the Buffa-slug logo… pointing out that breaking up PHI and NYR is just as bad in Flyer eyes as breaking up PHI and PIT… hearing from Columbus Blue Jacket and Phoenix Coyote fans (and Atlanta fans) who are just as passionate as any out there… here’s to hoping that the stupid strife of this lockout will at least create a smarter, better, more fair league where no one even again has to suffer through what the fans in Atlanta (yes, there are plenty), Hartford and Quebec City have had to endure in the relatively recent past.

Please keep coming back to the site to check out more hockey infographics, more polls, more silly venn diagrams and other (mostly) hockey shenanigans… and, almost undoubtedly more realignment scenarios (I just won’t be able to contain myself).

So thanks again for the patience and the participation. And here’s to hoping that the fans in Seattle and Quebec City get teams soon and that the league resolves its issues, and becomes healthy enough to grow and flourish forever.



6 Responses to NHL Realignment Project – Week 52

  1. Pingback: » What the 2013-14 NHL Should Look Like The Home Of The NHL Realignment Project

  2. Burgi says:

    Thanks for the work you have put in. I’ve loved it.

    I know it’s late, but how about this 4-divisional re-allignment plan? Haven’t seen it here before:

    Pacific/West (8): Edmonton, Calgary, Vancouver, Phoenix (Seattle), San Jose, LA Kings, Anaheim Ducks
    Central (7): Winnipeg, Minnesota, Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, Nashville, Dallas

    Southeast (7): Pittsburgh, Columbus, Philadelphia, Washington, Carolina, Tampa Bay, Florida
    Northeast (8): NY Rangers, NY Islanders, NJ Devils, Boston, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Buffalo

    – Within Division:
    – 6 or 5 games against each opponent (35 G overall per team for 7 team divisions, 38 overall for 8 team divisions)
    – Within Conference (other division of conference):
    – 3 games against each opponent –> 24 games for teams from 7-team division, 21 games for teams from 8 team divisions
    – Other Conference:
    – 1.5 games against each opponent except for one –> 21 games per team
    – 2 games against one “special” opponent (e.g.: Detroit vs. Pittsburgh or Columbus) –> 2 games per team

    – Advantages:
    – Geographical advantages:
    – You don’t have to play Winnipeg, Ottawa, Montreal, … in the SOUTHEAST
    – Minnesota plays against Winnipeg, Chicago, … instead of Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton

    – Each conference has 15 teams (as opposed to the “current” suggestion for re-allignment)
    – Local Rivalries:
    – (Nearly) all local rivalries remain intact. Exceptions: Flyers, Penguins lose the NY teams, Columbus loses Detroit.
    – New local rivalries can take off: Boston, Buffalo and Canadien teams vs. NY/NJ teams! Huge opportunities. Winnipeg vs. Minnesota, Minnesota vs. Chicago, Washington vs. Philly, Pittsburgh vs. Columbus, …
    – Detroit, Nashville, Chicago, St. Louis have lots of games on the west coast, but LESS than in 11/12 (at least 4 against each Pacific team).
    – Divisional rivalries emerge even further as proposed playoff-format (divisional champions play in conference championship) IS GREAT!
    – Divisions look fairly balanced in media coverage (Philly, Pitt bring needed media coverage and regularly strong teams to the southeast. NE of course has Boston, NY and CAN-markets. Central has CHI, DET and hockey-wild MIN and West has B.C./Alberta markets and LA) and in strength.

    So, what do you say? I fairly like it.

    • Burgi says:

      Ups … forgot the Avalanche. They are in the West.

    • tom says:

      Yeah. I like the format and the breakout a lot. Philly fans would freak about losing the Rangers. Great points about spreading out the “media darlings”… that can do nothing but good for the league overall.

      As much as we all joke about ESPN being hockey-less, if a spread like this gets NBC’s coverage a lot better reception from the fans and from “old man public perception”, when the next US TV contract comes up, ESPN might make a run for it. Even if they don’t get it and NBC wins again, the price tag will be much higher.

      It’d be interesting to see where expansion Quebec and Seattle would fit in (assuming Phoenix doesn’t move). Colorado to the Central to make room for Seattle seems logical… but the Eastern side of things gets way more complicated. Shipping Buffalo or one of the three NYC-area teams would cause an uproar. Fun times.

      Great stuff. Thanks for chippin’ in.


      • Burgi says:

        Thanks for answering.

        In case of expansion I’ve 2 scenarios:

        1: NEW (Quebec City, Seattle, Atlanta … I still think it could work with better ownership); GONE (Phoenix)

        WEST: Edmonton, Calgary, Seattle, Vancouver, San Jose, LA Kings, Anaheim, Colorado
        CENTRAL: Winnipeg, Minnesota, Chicago, Detroit, Columbus, Nashville, St. Louis, Dallas
        NORTHEAST: Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Buffalo, Boston, NY Rangers, NY Islanders
        SOUTHEAST: New Jersey, Philly, Pittsburgh, Washington, Carolina, Atlanta, Tampa Bay, Florida

        6 games against 3 main opponents in division, 5 against the 4 others (e.g.: Rangers with 6 against Bruins, Sabres and Isles; 5 against Maple Leafs, Canadiens, Nordiques and Senators)
        –> 38 games
        3 games against other division in conference
        –> 24 games
        1 or 2 games against other conference
        –> 20 games

        – Atlanta still is a better hockey market than Phoenix (while it doesn’t seem to happen). They only need a strong front office and owner
        – Even fewer games for DET and COLU on West Coast and only 1 time zone within division.
        – Rangers fans lose Philly and Pitt, but they “win” the Bruins, Canadiens and Maple Leafs as well as in-state Sabres. Lots of original-6 match-ups!
        – Washington finally has the chance for real rivalries

        – Splitting up the Atlantic (NJ to the SOUTHEAST!!!; Rangers without Flyers … as you said)
        – NJ should be fine with especially Philly, Pitt and Washington as new in-division rivals.

        2: NEW (Quebec City, Seattle)

        WEST: Edmonton, Calgary, Seattle, Vancouver, San Jose, LA Kings, Anaheim, Phoenix
        CENTRAL: Winnipeg, Minnesota, Chicago, Detroit, Colorado, Nashville, St. Louis, Dallas
        NORTHEAST: Quebec, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Buffalo, Boston, NY Rangers, NY Islanders
        SOUTHEAST: New Jersey, Philly, Pittsburgh, Washington, Carolina, Columbus, Tampa Bay, Florida

        Worse for Detroit, Colorado, Columbus

  3. Romualdo says:

    Good for you, because today I had to tell my emeylope who has been living with his partner for 18 years he could not add his partner to the company’s health insurance. I felt like sh*t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.